Find the risky changes before the branch lands.
分支合并前，先把真正危险的改动挑出来。
Best first pick for high-signal PR review. It reads the actual diff instead of re-summarizing the whole repo, so the review stays grounded in code that changed. Strongest on trust-boundary cases — SQL injection, auth checks, conditional side-effects — where surface reviewers usually miss the failure mode. Skip it for pure style nits; bring in a linter instead. Try it on a feature branch before relying on it for hot-fix gating.
高信号 PR 评审的首选。它读的是 diff 本身，而不是把整个仓库重新总结一遍，所以评审会落在真正变化的代码上。最擅长信任边界类问题——SQL 注入、鉴权检查、条件分支副作用——这些在浅层评审里最容易漏掉。纯样式问题别用它，丢给 linter 更划算。建议先在普通 feature 分支上验过一次，再放到 hot-fix 流程里用。
Use npx skills add to install this skill into the selected agent. Phase 0 commands are generated from source rules, not verified.
npx skills add https://github.com/garrytan/gstack/tree/main/review -g -a codex -yDrop `-g` to install project-locally
Pre-flight every branch before you ask for review.
Find the bugs, regressions, and missing tests first.
Fill the obvious testing holes before CI embarrasses you.
| this skill · 当前GStack Review | Git Shiproom | Review Radar | Test Bench | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating · 评分 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 4.4 |
| Stars · 星标 | 123k | 13k | 11k | 6.1k |
| Risk · 风险 | Low risk · 低风险 | Low risk · 低风险 | Low risk · 低风险 | Low risk · 低风险 |
| Best for · 最适合 | Pre-merge PR review | Pre-flight every branch before you ask for review. | Find the bugs, regressions, and missing tests first. | Fill the obvious testing holes before CI embarrasses you. |
| Not for · 不适合 | Pure style review | Workflows that require stronger human review than this catalog entry documents. | Workflows that require stronger human review than this catalog entry documents. | Workflows that require stronger human review than this catalog entry documents. |